Some of the older rich folk, like Aussie-American Mr. Rupert Murdoch, have only kept up with the internet age by buying anything they can get their hands on. Some investments have succeeded while others have failed.
But the bottom line has been that the Murdoch types have not been the innovators of the internet age, but have tried wherever possible to line themselves up as the beneficiaries.
Old man Rupert has now thrown up a curly! He is hinting that he will consider charging people for reading his online news!
He was quoted by Fairfax competitor SMH: "There is no doubt that the traditional newspaper model has to change... classified revenues are undoubtedly migrating to the web, probably not to return."
The reason classified revenue is migrating to the web is because that is where the audience prefers to read your newspapers Mr. Murdoch. And why the web? Ummmm... maybe because it is a very accessible source... Part of its accessible allure is that internet news is free!
Murdoch is further quoted by SMH as using the success of The Wall Street Journal as reasoning that charging a 'subscription' for online content could work.
"That it is possible to charge for content on the web is obvious from the Journal's experience...," says the News Limited dynamo.
He is obviously not as stupid as he sounds, but Mr. Murdoch must surely be aware that the content of The Wall Street Journal, and even Australia's Crikey.com.au for that matter, is very different from the diatribe in his newspaper offerings like The Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun.
The Journal and Crikey offer original content - essays and commentary that is different to 'this happened and this was said' news.
If Murdoch goes down this path, he will most definitely add this online investment to News Limited's 'failed' list. It will be met with opposition from internet enthusiasts, while his competitors over at Fairfax will become the ultimate beneficiaries.


















save google wave campaign in full swing - see http...
the logo is nice...
...Very correct! I love the Google Wave logo!
...Google Wave going is a crying shame for one reason. The 'W' Wave logo is Google's ...
Amy J, I tend to agree... The fact that Google has left the code sitting there for developers to ...
i like the closing sentence most. "Because Google Wave is an outstanding product. Unfortunately, ...
GH, I think it is an interesting point that you bring up. Google is not incompetent, and you high...